The struggle was initially based on the Mujahidin's conservative views of jihad - defending a Muslim country against invaders.
However, it transformed into a proxy war with significant external involvement of Pakistan and the United States.
The conflict's goals evolved beyond the scope of traditional Jihad, yet maintained a claim to religious legitimacy.
Islam, according to the Jihadi narrative, is forever at war with enemies it must defeat by any means necessary.
Jihadism enabled the removal of Jihad's restrictions, promoting an eternal conflict against Islam's enemies.
Due to the way Jihad was implemented in Afghanistan, in modern times, the term 'jihad' has accrued both violent and non-violent interpretations.
According to
John Esposito, a professor for Middle Eastern studies,
Jihad can simply mean striving to live a moral life and defending Islam. On the other hand
Rudoph Peters, a scholar of Islamic law, explains that
moderate Muslim view Jihad as a just war in international law and fundamentalists view it as an expansion of Islam.